Do you use generative AI as part of your own writing practice? If yes, how? If not, why not?
In July 2025, I facilitated two lively Zoom conversations exploring this theme, broadcast live from my annual Mountain Rise writing retreat in Wengen, Switzerland. In keeping with the inclusive ethos of my 6-week Swordcraft series “I Dream of GenAI: A Playful Perfectionist’s Guide to Writing and Editing with Generative AI,” this WriteSPACE Special Event welcomed AI skeptics and early adopters alike, bringing together a range of human voices around an often contentious theme.
Afterwards, I couldn’t resist asking GenAI — in this case, Anthropic’s amiable chatbot Claude — to sum up the key messages and themes from both sessions.
Enjoy!
……………
GenAI on the Mountain: A WriteSPACE Special Event
This summary was produced by Claude (Anthropic's AI assistant) based on transcripts of two live Zoom sessions that Helen Sword hosted from her Mountain Rise writing retreat in Wengen, Switzerland. Helen provided the raw transcripts and asked me (Claude) to distill the key themes and insights from both hour-long discussions into a readable blog post, preserving participant voices while maintaining anonymity.
What happens when you gather writers from around the globe—from Japan to Australia to the American Midwest—to discuss generative AI while perched on a Swiss mountainside that once inspired Tolkien's vision of Rivendell? You get two fascinatingly rich conversations that reveal just how complex our relationship with "Genie" (Helen's preferred term for GenAI) has become.
Skeptics, Dabblers, and Early Adopters
The participants represented a delightful spectrum of AI engagement. On one end sat the resistors: one professor revealed that their anthropology department had banned AI entirely, requiring both faculty and students to sign contracts promising non-use. "I have negative feelings towards it," they admitted; “It's like a hundred percent of my students are cheating in AI."
In the middle were the cautious experimenters—those dipping their toes in AI waters with tools such as Grammarly's new generative features or Pro Writing Aid. One participant described a methodical approach: "I don't copy and paste, but I literally look [at the AI’s suggestions] and I type ... because I want to learn." Another used AI for the dreaded task of writing recommendation letters, finding that the tool's "hallucinations" actually proved useful by highlighting qualities they hadn't initially considered emphasizing.
At the enthusiastic end of the scale, a few participants shared more adventurous applications: using AI for grant writing (particularly valuable given Australia's brutal 5-15% funding success rates); conducting comparative analyses across multiple AI platforms; and even late-night therapeutic conversations with AI counselors.
The Craft vs. Convenience Debate
A central tension emerged around AI's role in the writing process. Helen's cardinal rule—"GenAI is not my ghostwriter"—resonated throughout both sessions. Participants grappled with the difference between using AI as a collaborative thinking partner versus a replacement for human creativity and judgment.
One participant noted that AI often produces "very flat" writing that lacks surprise and engagement. Another observed that, while AI can make writing more "productive," it doesn't necessarily make it faster: "I'm doing more rather than less work... it's not necessarily a time saver."
The most thoughtful users employed AI as they might a sophisticated thesaurus or research assistant—helpful for specific tasks but requiring constant human oversight and judgment. As one participant put it: "You're still making the decisions yourself, but at the same time, you're learning new skills."
Teaching in the Age of AI
The educational implications of GenAI sparked particularly animated discussion. While some institutions impose blanket bans, more nuanced approaches are emerging. Several participants described crafting assignments "inviting but not requiring" AI use, asking students to document their process transparently, or using AI detection as a learning opportunity rather than a “gotcha” moment.
One participant shared a brilliant low-tech precursor to AI-assisted recommendation letters: student-completed templates that invited self-reflection while providing the raw material for faculty recommendations. "It became a great coaching tool," they explained.
The Paradoxes of Human-AI Collaboration
Perhaps most intriguingly, participants noted GenAI's unexpected emotional intelligence. One described how a friend used AI to draft a supportive message to her adult son that avoided passive-aggressive undertones—something she struggled to achieve on her own. Another found AI surprisingly effective for empathetic late-night conversations, although Helen wisely cautioned about the seductive nature of such always-available responsiveness.
The sessions revealed a community wrestling thoughtfully with powerful new tools, neither blindly embracing nor reflexively rejecting them. As Helen observed, we can simultaneously worry about AI's broader societal implications while finding empowering ways to use these tools in our own practice.
The mountain setting seemed apt for these discussions—a place of perspective and reflection, where ancient landscapes meet cutting-edge technology, and where writers continue the eternal human task of making meaning with words, whether crafted by hand, voice, or in collaboration with our new digital genies.
……………
Not bad, eh?
I was tempted to rewrite Claude’s clunky image of “a community wrestling thoughtfully with powerful new tools,” but then I had a brainwave: instead, I invited another whizzy GenAI — ChatGPT’s image generator Dall-E — to provide an illustration of what such a wrestling match might actually look like.
True to form, when I asked for an image of “a scholarly writer wrestling thoughtfully with a genie” (I didn’t even try to include the community aspect of the metaphor!), Dall-E defaulted to a stereotypical image of a bespectacled, tweed-clad male scholar grappling awkwardly with a big, blue, naked, bearded genie. I made several attempts at asking GenAI to refine the image — more gender ambiguity, more colorful clothing, explicit referencing of AI tools — but gave up after the fourth try.
AI-generated images of “a scholar wrestling thoughtfully with a genie”
A warm thank you to all the writers who joined us for this session.
We look forward to seeing you all at the next WriteSPACE Special Event!
WriteSPACE and WS Studio members can find the full recording of the two-hour Special Event in their Videos library.
Not a member? Register to receive an email with a link to the video of the first hour.
Better yet! Join the WriteSPACE with a free 30 day trial, and access our full Library of videos and other writing resources as part of your membership plan.